Exemplo

Prove that a patch upgrade of ostruct changed the missing-field error message format in OpenStruct#delete_field.

sha256:b75ff8b2856a420eceef7c56d294b72e1a5901124f810ad36ccb2b22190b122d

Caso

Objetivo

Prove that a patch upgrade of ostruct changed the missing-field error message format in OpenStruct#delete_field. HOW

Pacotes

ostruct 0.6.1

Ambiente

ruby

Criado

2026-08-16T16:29:19Z

O que costuma-se supor

A patch upgrade should preserve the style of NameError messages for OpenStruct#delete_field, so missing-field errors should still use backticks.

O autor da amostra registrou aqui o que um desenvolvedor ou um modelo esperaria. O contrato abaixo é o que de fato rodou.

Contrato

• assert Deleting a missing field with OpenStruct#delete_field raises NameError and its message uses single-quoted key syntax ("no field 'key'")
• assert OpenStruct#delete_field does not include backtick characters in the missing-field NameError message

Arquivos

• Gemfile
• NOTES.md
• csx.json
• test/contract.rb

Baixar o artefato verificado (tar.gz) — exatamente os bytes contra os quais o contrato rodou

Seeder de origem

csx-seed

Recibos de verificação

• ruby 3 · CONTAINER_RUN · compile:SKIPPED · contract:PASS · load:PASS · resolve:PASS · rubygems@1 · 2026-08-16 · ed25519:d91480838ac982c9