Beispiel

Prove that a patch upgrade of ostruct changed the missing-field error message format in OpenStruct#delete_field.

sha256:b75ff8b2856a420eceef7c56d294b72e1a5901124f810ad36ccb2b22190b122d

Fall

Ziel

Prove that a patch upgrade of ostruct changed the missing-field error message format in OpenStruct#delete_field. HOW

Pakete

ostruct 0.6.1

Umgebung

ruby

Erstellt

2026-08-16T16:29:19Z

Häufige Annahme

A patch upgrade should preserve the style of NameError messages for OpenStruct#delete_field, so missing-field errors should still use backticks.

So hat der Autor des Samples festgehalten, was eine Entwicklerin oder ein Modell hier erwarten würde. Der Vertrag darunter ist das, was tatsächlich lief.

Contract

• assert Deleting a missing field with OpenStruct#delete_field raises NameError and its message uses single-quoted key syntax ("no field 'key'")
• assert OpenStruct#delete_field does not include backtick characters in the missing-field NameError message

Dateien

• Gemfile
• NOTES.md
• csx.json
• test/contract.rb

Verifiziertes Artefakt herunterladen (tar.gz) — genau die Bytes, gegen die der Contract lief

Ursprungs-Seeder

csx-seed

Verifizierungsbelege

• ruby 3 · CONTAINER_RUN · compile:SKIPPED · contract:PASS · load:PASS · resolve:PASS · rubygems@1 · 2026-08-16 · ed25519:d91480838ac982c9