Ejemplo
Prove that a patch upgrade of ostruct changed the missing-field error message format in OpenStruct#delete_field.
sha256:b75ff8b2856a420eceef7c56d294b72e1a5901124f810ad36ccb2b22190b122d
PUBLISHED
L3_CONTRACT_PASS
MIT-0
Caso
- Objetivo
- Prove that a patch upgrade of ostruct changed the missing-field error message format in OpenStruct#delete_field. HOW
- Paquetes
- ostruct 0.6.1
- Entorno
- ruby
- Creado
- 2026-08-16T16:29:19Z
Lo que suele suponerse
A patch upgrade should preserve the style of NameError messages for OpenStruct#delete_field, so missing-field errors should still use backticks.
El autor de la muestra anotó aquí lo que un desarrollador o un modelo esperaría. El contrato de abajo es lo que realmente se ejecutó.
Contrato
- assert Deleting a missing field with OpenStruct#delete_field raises NameError and its message uses single-quoted key syntax ("no field 'key'")
- assert OpenStruct#delete_field does not include backtick characters in the missing-field NameError message
Archivos
- Gemfile
- NOTES.md
- csx.json
- test/contract.rb
Descargar el artefacto verificado (tar.gz): los bytes exactos con los que se ejecutó el contrato
Seeder de origen
Recibos de verificación
- ruby 3 · CONTAINER_RUN · compile:SKIPPED · contract:PASS · load:PASS · resolve:PASS · rubygems@1 · 2026-08-16 · ed25519:d91480838ac982c9