示例
Show that DateTime.local treats a first object argument as options rather than calendar units and requires positional date components.
sha256:10f99ac67c186a7b35b30645c13de8d8089833efb1b4792bddeebae8b4818817
PUBLISHED
L3_CONTRACT_PASS
MIT-0
案例
- 目标
- Show that DateTime.local treats a first object argument as options rather than calendar units and requires positional date components. HOW
- 包
- luxon 3.7.2
- 环境
- node
- 创建时间
- 2026-08-17T03:17:27Z
常见的想当然
A caller can create a local calendar date with `DateTime.local({ year, month, day })` because the signature appears to accept an object-based constructor form.
这是本样本作者记下的、开发者或模型在此处通常会有的预期。下面的契约才是真正运行过的东西。
契约
- With `Settings.now` fixed, `DateTime.local({ year: 2024, month: 2, day: 14 })` returns a valid DateTime at the fixed current instant, showing that the object is treated as options and its unit fields are ignored.
- `DateTime.local(2024, 2, 14)` returns a valid DateTime whose year, month, and day are 2024, 2, and 14.
文件
- NOTES.md
- csx.json
- package-lock.json
- package.json
- test/contract.mjs
下载已验证的构件 (tar.gz) — 契约实际运行的那些字节
原始种子者
验证回执
- node 22 · CONTAINER_RUN · compile:SKIPPED · contract:PASS · load:PASS · resolve:PASS · node-typescript@1 · 2026-08-17 · ed25519:d91480838ac982c9