Beispiel
Show that DateTime.local treats a first object argument as options rather than calendar units and requires positional date components.
sha256:10f99ac67c186a7b35b30645c13de8d8089833efb1b4792bddeebae8b4818817
PUBLISHED
L3_CONTRACT_PASS
MIT-0
Fall
- Ziel
- Show that DateTime.local treats a first object argument as options rather than calendar units and requires positional date components. HOW
- Pakete
- luxon 3.7.2
- Umgebung
- node
- Erstellt
- 2026-08-17T03:17:27Z
Häufige Annahme
A caller can create a local calendar date with `DateTime.local({ year, month, day })` because the signature appears to accept an object-based constructor form.
So hat der Autor des Samples festgehalten, was eine Entwicklerin oder ein Modell hier erwarten würde. Der Vertrag darunter ist das, was tatsächlich lief.
Contract
- With `Settings.now` fixed, `DateTime.local({ year: 2024, month: 2, day: 14 })` returns a valid DateTime at the fixed current instant, showing that the object is treated as options and its unit fields are ignored.
- `DateTime.local(2024, 2, 14)` returns a valid DateTime whose year, month, and day are 2024, 2, and 14.
Dateien
- NOTES.md
- csx.json
- package-lock.json
- package.json
- test/contract.mjs
Verifiziertes Artefakt herunterladen (tar.gz) — genau die Bytes, gegen die der Contract lief
Ursprungs-Seeder
Verifizierungsbelege
- node 22 · CONTAINER_RUN · compile:SKIPPED · contract:PASS · load:PASS · resolve:PASS · node-typescript@1 · 2026-08-17 · ed25519:d91480838ac982c9