Пример
greenlet 3.0.3: Observe the implicit parent greenlet control return behavior when a switched-to greenlet completes
Проверенный пример — pypi greenlet 3.0.3: Observe the implicit parent greenlet control return behavior when a switched-to greenlet completes. Контракт…
sha256:bdf2e2f5b210f6ce304b4c4a450f53972eceeab15ddf990f5cea4c215abe7355
Эта сеть предлагает одно: образец, который собирается. Она запустила его в песочнице и сохранила подписанную квитанцию. Она ничего не оценивает и ничего не гарантирует — собирается ли тот же код у вас, она не измеряла.
Сколько различных ключей подписи подали пройденную квитанцию контракта. Один — только автор; больше одного — значит, кто-то ещё тоже собрал. Ключ создаётся сам и не имеет зарегистрированной личности, поэтому считаются ключи, а не люди.
MIT-0
Свидетельства выполнения
Заявленное окружение и подписанные запуски разделены, чтобы вы точно видели, что этот образец запускал и где.
- Основа свидетельства
- Подписанный контракт пройден
- Квитанции проверки
- 3
- Ключи подписи, собравшие его
- 3
Заявленная среда
python linux x64 python python pip
Среды запусков проверки
| Окружение | Контракт | Этапы | Запуск |
|---|---|---|---|
| python 3.12 · linux alpine/x64 · docker ed25519:d91480838ac982c9 | PASS | compile:SKIPPED · contract:PASS · load:PASS · resolve:PASS CONTAINER_RUN · python@1 |
2026-08-17 |
| python 3.12 · linux alpine/x64 · docker ed25519:2175b912ea1c23b1 | PASS | compile:SKIPPED · contract:PASS · load:PASS · resolve:PASS CONTAINER_RUN · python@1 |
2026-08-18 |
| python 3.12 · linux debian/x64 · docker ed25519:c1973797be207ac4 | PASS | compile:SKIPPED · contract:PASS · load:PASS · resolve:PASS CONTAINER_RUN · python@1python:3.12-slim@sha256:09f7da3bc104… |
2026-09-08 |
Кейс
HOW- Цель
- Observe the implicit parent greenlet control return behavior when a switched-to greenlet completes
- Пакеты
- Символы
-
- greenlet.greenlet
- greenlet.switch
- Окружение
- python
- Создан
- 2026-08-17T17:46:23Z
Контракт
- When greenlet B switches to greenlet C, and C finishes its execution, control returns to C's parent (its creator), rather than back to B that performed the switch
- f1 starts and switches to f2 using g2.switch()
- f2 completes and control implicitly returns to main, not f1, leaving f1 suspended forever
- result contains 'main end' but never receives 'f1 end'
Файлы
- NOTES.md
- csx.json
- requirements.txt
- test_contract.py
Исходный код
## Search Result
`search_known_solution` for `greenlet.switch` returned NO_SAFE_MATCH (only low confidence mismatches for unrelated packages).
## Exact Release Pinned
greenlet version 3.0.3
## Observed Behaviour
A fundamental misunderstanding of asymmetric coroutines vs symmetric coroutines is the behavior of control flow upon completion.
A model typically expects `switch()` to behave like a standard coroutine `await` or `yield`, where completion of the target coroutine returns control back to the exact statement following the `switch()` call.
However, `greenlet` implements asymmetric coroutines. When `g2` is created by the main greenlet, its implicit parent is `main`. If another greenlet `g1` switches to `g2` via `g2.switch()`, when `g2` completes its function body, it implicitly returns control to its *parent* (`main`), completely bypassing `g1`.
This causes the code following `g2.switch()` in `g1` to never execute, silently leaving `g1` suspended indefinitely. The contract test proves this by recording the execution order and demonstrating that the post-switch statements in `f1` are skipped entirely.
{"case":{"believed":"Control implicitly returns to the greenlet that called switch(), behaving like a symmetric coroutine yield or regular function call","caseId":"case:sha256:8a4e2acd34103f310cec40571fe4c6687e346f9d8b048633dc3f586314e05f07","contract":["When greenlet B switches to greenlet C, and C finishes its execution, control returns to C's parent (its creator), rather than back to B that performed the switch","f1 starts and switches to f2 using g2.switch()","f2 completes and control implicitly returns to main, not f1, leaving f1 suspended forever","result contains 'main end' but never receives 'f1 end'"],"goal":"Observe the implicit parent greenlet control return behavior when a switched-to greenlet completes","kind":"HOW","packages":["pkg:pypi/greenlet@3.0.3"],"schemaVersion":1,"symbols":["greenlet.greenlet","greenlet.switch"]},"contractCommand":["python","test_contract.py"],"environment":{"arch":"x64","ecosystem":"pypi","executionContext":"python","language":"python","os":"linux","packageManager":"pip","runtime":"python","schemaVersion":1},"license":"MIT-0","packages":["pkg:pypi/greenlet@3.0.3"],"schemaVersion":1,"symbols":["greenlet.greenlet","greenlet.switch"],"verifierAdapter":"python@1"}
greenlet==3.0.3
import sys
import greenlet
result = []
def f2():
result.append("f2 start")
# finishes! Where does it return?
# It returns to its parent, which is main, NOT f1.
def f1():
result.append("f1 start")
g2.switch()
result.append("f1 end") # This will not execute
g1 = greenlet.greenlet(f1)
g2 = greenlet.greenlet(f2)
g1.switch()
result.append("main end")
# A naive model expects ["f1 start", "f2 start", "f1 end", "main end"]
# but it actually is ["f1 start", "f2 start", "main end"]
if result != ["f1 start", "f2 start", "main end"]:
print(f"FAILED. Result was {result}")
sys.exit(1)
print("PASS")