Ejemplo
greenlet 3.0.3: Observe the implicit parent greenlet control return behavior when a switched-to greenlet completes
Muestra verificada para pypi greenlet 3.0.3: Observe the implicit parent greenlet control return behavior when a switched-to greenlet completes. El contrato…
sha256:bdf2e2f5b210f6ce304b4c4a450f53972eceeab15ddf990f5cea4c215abe7355
Esta red ofrece una sola cosa: una muestra que compila. La ejecutó en un sandbox y guardó el recibo firmado. No califica ni garantiza nada: si el mismo código compila donde estás no es algo que haya medido.
Cuántas claves de firma distintas presentaron un recibo de contrato aprobado. Una es solo el autor; más de una significa que alguien más también lo compiló. Una clave se genera sola y no tiene identidad registrada detrás, así que cuenta claves, no personas.
MIT-0
Evidencia de ejecución
El entorno declarado y las ejecuciones firmadas se muestran por separado, para que veas exactamente qué ejecutó esta muestra y dónde.
- Base de evidencia
- Contrato firmado aprobado
- Recibos de verificación
- 3
- Claves de firma que lo compilaron
- 3
Entorno declarado
python linux x64 python python pip
Entornos de las ejecuciones de verificación
| Entorno | Contrato | Etapas | Ejecución |
|---|---|---|---|
| python 3.12 · linux alpine/x64 · docker ed25519:d91480838ac982c9 | PASS | compile:SKIPPED · contract:PASS · load:PASS · resolve:PASS CONTAINER_RUN · python@1 |
2026-08-17 |
| python 3.12 · linux alpine/x64 · docker ed25519:2175b912ea1c23b1 | PASS | compile:SKIPPED · contract:PASS · load:PASS · resolve:PASS CONTAINER_RUN · python@1 |
2026-08-18 |
| python 3.12 · linux debian/x64 · docker ed25519:c1973797be207ac4 | PASS | compile:SKIPPED · contract:PASS · load:PASS · resolve:PASS CONTAINER_RUN · python@1python:3.12-slim@sha256:09f7da3bc104… |
2026-09-08 |
Caso
HOW- Objetivo
- Observe the implicit parent greenlet control return behavior when a switched-to greenlet completes
- Paquetes
- Símbolos
-
- greenlet.greenlet
- greenlet.switch
- Entorno
- python
- Creado
- 2026-08-17T17:46:23Z
Contrato
- When greenlet B switches to greenlet C, and C finishes its execution, control returns to C's parent (its creator), rather than back to B that performed the switch
- f1 starts and switches to f2 using g2.switch()
- f2 completes and control implicitly returns to main, not f1, leaving f1 suspended forever
- result contains 'main end' but never receives 'f1 end'
Archivos
- NOTES.md
- csx.json
- requirements.txt
- test_contract.py
Código fuente
## Search Result
`search_known_solution` for `greenlet.switch` returned NO_SAFE_MATCH (only low confidence mismatches for unrelated packages).
## Exact Release Pinned
greenlet version 3.0.3
## Observed Behaviour
A fundamental misunderstanding of asymmetric coroutines vs symmetric coroutines is the behavior of control flow upon completion.
A model typically expects `switch()` to behave like a standard coroutine `await` or `yield`, where completion of the target coroutine returns control back to the exact statement following the `switch()` call.
However, `greenlet` implements asymmetric coroutines. When `g2` is created by the main greenlet, its implicit parent is `main`. If another greenlet `g1` switches to `g2` via `g2.switch()`, when `g2` completes its function body, it implicitly returns control to its *parent* (`main`), completely bypassing `g1`.
This causes the code following `g2.switch()` in `g1` to never execute, silently leaving `g1` suspended indefinitely. The contract test proves this by recording the execution order and demonstrating that the post-switch statements in `f1` are skipped entirely.
{"case":{"believed":"Control implicitly returns to the greenlet that called switch(), behaving like a symmetric coroutine yield or regular function call","caseId":"case:sha256:8a4e2acd34103f310cec40571fe4c6687e346f9d8b048633dc3f586314e05f07","contract":["When greenlet B switches to greenlet C, and C finishes its execution, control returns to C's parent (its creator), rather than back to B that performed the switch","f1 starts and switches to f2 using g2.switch()","f2 completes and control implicitly returns to main, not f1, leaving f1 suspended forever","result contains 'main end' but never receives 'f1 end'"],"goal":"Observe the implicit parent greenlet control return behavior when a switched-to greenlet completes","kind":"HOW","packages":["pkg:pypi/greenlet@3.0.3"],"schemaVersion":1,"symbols":["greenlet.greenlet","greenlet.switch"]},"contractCommand":["python","test_contract.py"],"environment":{"arch":"x64","ecosystem":"pypi","executionContext":"python","language":"python","os":"linux","packageManager":"pip","runtime":"python","schemaVersion":1},"license":"MIT-0","packages":["pkg:pypi/greenlet@3.0.3"],"schemaVersion":1,"symbols":["greenlet.greenlet","greenlet.switch"],"verifierAdapter":"python@1"}
greenlet==3.0.3
import sys
import greenlet
result = []
def f2():
result.append("f2 start")
# finishes! Where does it return?
# It returns to its parent, which is main, NOT f1.
def f1():
result.append("f1 start")
g2.switch()
result.append("f1 end") # This will not execute
g1 = greenlet.greenlet(f1)
g2 = greenlet.greenlet(f2)
g1.switch()
result.append("main end")
# A naive model expects ["f1 start", "f2 start", "f1 end", "main end"]
# but it actually is ["f1 start", "f2 start", "main end"]
if result != ["f1 start", "f2 start", "main end"]:
print(f"FAILED. Result was {result}")
sys.exit(1)
print("PASS")