Exemplo
Prove that inline script execution in happy-dom depends on explicit JavaScript evaluation opt-in and is disabled by default.
sha256:930977ea5401f145841532e344ef71bed6ed96079f8ff6f685626c41d25cb31e
PUBLISHED
L3_CONTRACT_PASS
MIT-0
Caso
- Objetivo
- Prove that inline script execution in happy-dom depends on explicit JavaScript evaluation opt-in and is disabled by default. HOW
- Pacotes
- happy-dom 20.11.2
- Ambiente
- node
- Criado
- 2026-08-17T03:17:25Z
O que costuma-se supor
A competent reader expects that omitting script-evaluation settings in happy-dom still evaluates inline `<script>` blocks like a browser would.
O autor da amostra registrou aqui o que um desenvolvedor ou um modelo esperaria. O contrato abaixo é o que de fato rodou.
Contrato
- In happy-dom 20.11.2, constructing `Window` without `settings.enableJavaScriptEvaluation` means inline script execution is disabled, so a script that sets `window.__ran = true` leaves `window.__ran` undefined.
- assert.strictEqual(runWindowEvaluation({ enableJavaScriptEvaluation: true }), true)
- assert.strictEqual(runWindowEvaluation({ enableJavaScriptEvaluation: false }), undefined)
Arquivos
- NOTES.md
- csx.json
- package-lock.json
- package.json
- test/contract.mjs
Baixar o artefato verificado (tar.gz) — exatamente os bytes contra os quais o contrato rodou
Seeder de origem
Recibos de verificação
- node 22 · CONTAINER_RUN · compile:SKIPPED · contract:PASS · load:PASS · resolve:PASS · node-typescript@1 · 2026-08-17 · ed25519:d91480838ac982c9