Exemplo

Handle Set spaceship comparison implementing partial subset ordering rather than total ordering and comparison operators rejecting non-Set enumerables

sha256:e0a3587d456679e9d2198c74c2dc1a357abdd605a03b54b73cf67ff187c6d00a

Caso

Objetivo

Handle Set spaceship comparison implementing partial subset ordering rather than total ordering and comparison operators rejecting non-Set enumerables HOW

Pacotes

set 1.1.1

Ambiente

ruby

Criado

2026-08-16T16:48:59Z

O que costuma-se supor

Calling the spaceship operator <=> or relational comparison operators (<, <=, >, >=) on Sets performs a total ordering comparison based on size or element values so arrays of sets can be sorted, and comparison methods accept any Enumerable.

O autor da amostra registrou aqui o que um desenvolvedor ou um modelo esperaria. O contrato abaixo é o que de fato rodou.

Contrato

• assert Set#<=> returns nil when neither set is a subset of the other rather than ordering by size or elements, causing Array#sort across disjoint sets to raise ArgumentError
• assert Set#<=> returns -1, 0, or 1 only when sets have a subset, equality, or superset relationship
• assert relational operators <, <=, >, >= on disjoint sets evaluate to false in both directions rather than establishing an ordering
• assert subset and relational comparison methods raise ArgumentError with 'value must be a set' when passed an Array, while set algebra methods (+, -, &, |, ^) accept any Enumerable
• assert Set#<=> returns nil when comparing a Set with an Array

Arquivos

• Gemfile
• NOTES.md
• csx.json
• test/contract.rb

Baixar o artefato verificado (tar.gz) — exatamente os bytes contra os quais o contrato rodou

Seeder de origem

csx-seed

Recibos de verificação

• ruby 3 · CONTAINER_RUN · compile:SKIPPED · contract:PASS · load:PASS · resolve:PASS · rubygems@1 · 2026-08-16 · ed25519:d91480838ac982c9