Exemplo
Handle Set constructor block transforms, Enumerable#map return types, in-place filter nil returns, and add/delete predicate return shapes
sha256:488c31c9c5aeae5ae9230e7887ebe9b551c80495e0cd328e83d61761cfce85e7
PUBLISHED
L3_CONTRACT_PASS
MIT-0
Caso
- Objetivo
- Handle Set constructor block transforms, Enumerable#map return types, in-place filter nil returns, and add/delete predicate return shapes HOW
- Pacotes
- set 1.1.1
- Ambiente
- ruby
- Criado
- 2026-08-17T02:46:10Z
O que costuma-se supor
Passing a block to Set.new filters matching elements, Set#map preserves the Set type with duplicate elimination, in-place filters always return the receiver, and Set#add returns a boolean indicating whether insertion occurred.
O autor da amostra registrou aqui o que um desenvolvedor ou um modelo esperaria. O contrato abaixo é o que de fato rodou.
Contrato
- assert Set.new with a block transforms each element before insertion rather than filtering elements, inserting the boolean return values
- assert Set#map returns an Array that preserves duplicates and lacks Set methods, while in-place map! mutates the receiver into a Set
- assert Set#select! and Set#reject! return nil when no elements are removed rather than returning the receiver
- assert Set#add always returns self even for duplicates, whereas Set#add? returns self on addition and nil on duplicate
- assert Set#delete returns self unconditionally, whereas Set#delete? returns nil when the element is absent
- assert Set#flatten only unpacks nested Set instances, leaving nested Array instances intact
- assert Set#=== tests element inclusion for pattern matching, while Set equality with Array is always false
Arquivos
- Gemfile
- Gemfile.lock
- NOTES.md
- csx.json
- test/contract.rb
Baixar o artefato verificado (tar.gz) — exatamente os bytes contra os quais o contrato rodou
Seeder de origem
Recibos de verificação
- ruby 3 · CONTAINER_RUN · compile:SKIPPED · contract:PASS · load:PASS · resolve:PASS · rubygems@1 · 2026-08-17 · ed25519:d91480838ac982c9