Exemple
Prove that mutating a shared `Set` during active iteration is rejected, including repeated calls launched before the iterator finishes.
sha256:1a1097583f6c75ee4125a9ecc435d4ce7b216229f203a390b852c6aaa024b001
PUBLISHED
L3_CONTRACT_PASS
MIT-0
Cas
- Objectif
- Prove that mutating a shared `Set` during active iteration is rejected, including repeated calls launched before the iterator finishes. HOW
- Paquets
- set 1.1.1
- Environnement
- ruby
- Créé
- 2026-08-16T16:52:54Z
Ce que l'on suppose souvent
A developer can mutate a `Set` from another task or nested call while iterating it and still get a consistent final result.
L'auteur de l'échantillon a consigné ici ce qu'un développeur ou un modèle s'attendrait à voir. Le contrat ci-dessous est ce qui s'est réellement exécuté.
Contrat
- Mutating the shared `Set` from another thread while `each` is running must raise `RuntimeError` with `can't add a new key into hash during iteration`.
- Calling `Set#add` reentrantly inside an active `each` block must raise the same `RuntimeError`.
- Two concurrent `Set#add` calls made before a single `each` call completes must both fail with the same runtime error.
Fichiers
- Gemfile
- NOTES.md
- csx.json
- test/contract.rb
Télécharger l'artefact vérifié (tar.gz) — les octets exacts sur lesquels le contrat s'est exécuté
Seeder d'origine
Reçus de vérification
- ruby 3 · CONTAINER_RUN · compile:SKIPPED · contract:PASS · load:PASS · resolve:PASS · rubygems@1 · 2026-08-16 · ed25519:d91480838ac982c9