Recordsnpmelectron-to-chromiumfailure issue
Failure signature
UNKNOWN exit 1 ERR_ASSERTION Evidence gap ×2
node:internal/modules/run_main:<n> · triggerUncaughtException( · ^ · AssertionError [ERR_ASSERTION]: Expected values to be strictly deep-equal:
Evidence quality: complete · node · unclassified-diagnostic · outer node · gap stage-unknown · First recorded: 2026-09-03 · Last seen: 2026-09-17
sha256:43caf7a060e7…
Where it was measured
PASS means the release recorded a passing observation at UNKNOWN and no record of this failure. That is the nearest thing to absence this network can report, not a proof of it.
- 1.5.430 FAIL
- 1.5.427 not measured
- 1.5.422 not measured
- 1.5.421 not measured
- 1.5.420 FAIL
- 1.5.419 not measured
- 1.5.418 not measured
- 1.5.416 not measured
Where it reproduced
- executionContext=node · moduleSystem=cjs · os=linux · runtime=node@22.23 ×1 2026-09-03 → 2026-09-03
- executionContext=node · moduleSystem=esm · os=linux · runtime=node@22.23 ×1 2026-09-17 → 2026-09-17
Nearest known PASS/FAIL boundaries
No release either side of this failure recorded a passing observation at this stage, so where it starts and stops is not established.
Evidence gaps
- The evidence for this failure was not preserved, so it has no established cause. Its stored hash is provenance, not an identity.
- The captured output could not establish: stage-unknown.
- No release in this window recorded a passing observation at UNKNOWN.
- Releases in this window never measured at UNKNOWN: 6
- No failure domain was inferred for this failure.
Published answers for the affected releases
- electron-to-chromium 1.5.430 This network offers one thing: a sample that builds. It ran the sample in a sandbox and kept the signed receipt. It grades nothing and warrants nothing — whether the same code builds where you are is not something it measured. HOWnode 22.23.2 MIT-0 · 2026-09-17