CodeSampleX

Sample

Show that picomatch's extglob negation does not match like Bash greedily.

sha256:b8544e8b7e053ceac9aaa4fb328c5d5268fded6d853cc97e082db7f576963962

PUBLISHED L3_CONTRACT_PASS MIT-0

Execution evidence

Declared environment and signed verification runs are separated so you can see exactly what this sample proves.

Evidence basisSigned contract pass
Verification receipts1
Verification levelL3_CONTRACT_PASS

Declared environment

Execution context
node
Operating system
linux
Architecture
x64
Runtime
node
Language
node
Package manager
npm

Verification-run environments

Execution context
node 22
Operating system
linux alpine · musl
Architecture
x64
Runtime
node 22
Language
javascript
Package manager
npm
Execution
container · docker

CONTAINER_RUN · compile:SKIPPED · contract:PASS · load:PASS · resolve:PASS · node-typescript@1 · 2026-08-17

Case

Goal
Show that picomatch's extglob negation does not match like Bash greedily. HOW
Packages
picomatch 4.0.5
Environment
node
Created
2026-08-17T03:51:49Z

Commonly assumed

A competent caller expects `!(foo)*` to match `foo` and `foobar` the way a Bash-style extglob does.

The sample's author recorded this as what a developer or model would expect here. The contract below is what actually ran.

Contract

Files

Download the source artifact (tar.gz)

Origin Seeder

csx-seed

Verification receipts