Recordsnpmvitest4.1.10environment
Change the conditions
Current conditions
environment @4.1.10alpine musl · x64 · node 22 · npm · node
2 of 2 passed
Verified — this network ran a contract at this coordinate.
there is a sample here, and our run of it at this coordinate came back clean (1)
- Project observations
- nothing at this coordinate
- Contract verifications
- 2 / 2
- Cross-checked
- reproduced by two or more independent peers
- Last recorded
- 2026-09-07
Dependency Health
Observed combinations and failure evidence for this release
First observed break
4.1.10
executionContext=node · moduleSystem=esm
5 FAIL · stage: PROJECT_PROCESS
| Library | Version | Health | Measured there | Projects |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @vitest/expect | 4.1.10 | CANDIDATE Correlated change; unproven combination | builds observed | 3 project-days |
| @vitest/mocker | 4.1.10 | CANDIDATE Correlated change; unproven combination | contract passed | 3 project-days |
| @vitest/pretty-format | 4.1.10 | CANDIDATE Correlated change; unproven combination | contract passed | 3 project-days |
| @vitest/runner | 4.1.10 | CANDIDATE Correlated change; unproven combination | contract passed | 3 project-days |
| @vitest/snapshot | 4.1.10 | CANDIDATE Correlated change; unproven combination | contract passed | 3 project-days |
| @vitest/spy | 4.1.10 | CANDIDATE Correlated change; unproven combination | contract passed | 3 project-days |
| @vitest/utils | 4.1.10 | CANDIDATE Correlated change; unproven combination | contract passed | 3 project-days |
| es-module-lexer | 2.3.1 | CANDIDATE Correlated change; unproven combination | contract passed | 2 project-days |
| es-module-lexer | 2.3.2 | CANDIDATE Correlated change; unproven combination | contract passed | 1 project-day |
| expect-type | 1.4.0 | CANDIDATE Correlated change; unproven combination | contract passed | 3 project-days |
| obug | 2.1.4 | CANDIDATE Correlated change; unproven combination | contract passed | 3 project-days |
| pathe | 2.0.3 | CANDIDATE Correlated change; unproven combination | contract passed | 3 project-days |
| picomatch | 4.0.5 | CANDIDATE Correlated change; unproven combination | contract passed | 3 project-days |
| std-env | 4.2.0 | CANDIDATE Correlated change; unproven combination | contract passed | 3 project-days |
| tinyexec | 1.3.0 | CANDIDATE Correlated change; unproven combination | contract passed | 3 project-days |
| tinyglobby | 0.2.17 | CANDIDATE Correlated change; unproven combination | contract passed | 3 project-days |
| tinyrainbow | 3.1.1 | CANDIDATE Correlated change; unproven combination | contract passed | 3 project-days |
| vite | 8.2.1 | CANDIDATE Correlated change; unproven combination | contract passed | 3 project-days |
| magic-string | 0.30.21 | PASS All observations passed | contract passed | 3 project-days |
| tinybench | 2.9.0 | PASS All observations passed | contract passed | 3 project-days |
| why-is-node-running | 2.3.0 | PASS All observations passed | contract passed | 3 project-days |
The measured column is about each dependency's own release, not about the pair. A resolver placing two releases side by side is not evidence that they work together.
Dependency versions across releases
What each release of this package resolved its children to. A child whose version moved is listed first: that is where an upgrade changed something underneath you.
Moved: 18 · unchanged at every release: 7
An edge records that a resolver placed one release beside another on a real machine. It is not a claim that the two work together; that question is answered by samples and contracts, not by presence here.
Recent failure clusters
-
observed PROJECT_PROCESS ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND Evidence gap ×5 3.2.7 → 4.1.10 executionContext=node · moduleSystem=esmEvidence quality: legacy-evidence-incomplete · Environment variants: 2 · First recorded: 2026-08-14 · Last seen: 2026-08-30Diagnostic re-verification candidate