CodeSampleX

Recordsnpmupdate-browserslist-db1.2.3update-browserslist-db.length

Change the conditions
Fixed
OSubuntu glibc Symbolupdate-browserslist-db.length Execution contextnode
Filter Runtimenode 22 Package version1.2.3 Architecturex64 Package managernpm 10 libcglibc Clear filters

Current conditions

update-browserslist-db.length @1.2.3ubuntu glibc · x64 · node 22 · npm 10 · node

4 of 4 passed

Observed — real project builds reported from this coordinate.

there is a sample here, and nothing of ours has run it at this coordinate yet (1)

Project observations
4 / 4
Contract verifications
nothing at this coordinate
Independent reporting peers
1
Last recorded
2026-09-07

Dependency Health

Observed combinations and failure evidence for this release

Observed problems 1 · Steady 2

First observed break

1.2.3

windows · executionContext=node

7 FAIL · stage: PROJECT_TEST

Library Version Health Measured there Projects
escalade 3.2.0 PASS All observations passed contract passed 10 project-days
picocolors 1.1.1 PASS All observations passed contract passed 10 project-days

The measured column is about each dependency's own release, not about the pair. A resolver placing two releases side by side is not evidence that they work together.

Dependency versions across releases

What each release of this package resolved its children to. A child whose version moved is listed first: that is where an upgrade changed something underneath you.

Library1.3.31.3.21.3.11.3.01.2.3
escalade 3.2.0 3.2.0 3.2.0 3.2.0 3.2.0
picocolors 1.1.1 1.1.1 1.1.1 1.1.1 1.1.1

Moved: 0 · unchanged at every release: 2

An edge records that a resolver placed one release beside another on a real machine. It is not a claim that the two work together; that question is answered by samples and contracts, not by presence here.