Recordsnpmtape5.10.2
Which symbol ran where
Symbols × operating systems for this version. Cells drill into the package's compatibility cube.
Reading a cell: The number is how many recorded observations the rate divides — one build files an observation per stage it reached, so it counts neither builds nor machines nor people. The document beside it is a different fact from a different source: whether a sample exists at that coordinate, and how our own run of it went there.
- no sample at this coordinate yet
- there is a sample here, and nothing of ours has run it at this coordinate yet
- there is a sample here, and our run of it at this coordinate came back clean
- there is a sample here, and our run of it at this coordinate failed
- there is a sample here, and this coordinate records both a passing and a failing run of it
- nothing recorded — unknown, never "works" and never "broken"
- there is a level below this cell — click to open it
A document means there is a sample at that coordinate. Whether one EXISTS is a fact about this release and this API and does not change with OS, runtime or package manager; its COLOUR is how that sample ran in the environment you are looking at.
Environment detail
Project-level observations and symbol/contract verifications are counted separately and never combined.
These counts do not distinguish how the symbol was called: overloads, argument shapes and options are pooled together. What a particular call shape does is proven by a sample's contract, not by these numbers.
| Environment | Confidence | Observations | Verified | Pass rate | Peers | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| node 22 · JS · npm · linux glibc · docker
Observations: PROJECT_LOAD 2✓ · PROJECT_TEST 2✓ — Usage: USED 2✓ — Verified: CONTRACT 1✓
|
LOW | 4 +2 | 1 | 100% | 1 · 1✓ | 2026-09-17 |
| node 22.23 · JS · npm · linux glibc
Observations: PROJECT_PROCESS 3✓ — Verified: UNKNOWN 0✓ 2✕
|
ELEVATED FAILURE | 3 | 2 | 60% | 1 | 2026-09-14 |
| node 22.23 · JS · yarn · linux glibc
Observations: PROJECT_PROCESS 4✓
|
LOW | 4 | 0 | 100% | 1 | 2026-09-07 |
Recent failure clusters
-
observed UNKNOWN exit 1 ERR_ASSERTION Evidence gap ×2 5.10.2 executionContext=node · moduleSystem=cjs · os=linux · runtime=node@22.23 tape.createHarness sha256:7761a9558e89…node:internal/modules/run_main:<n> · triggerUncaughtException( · ^ · AssertionError [ERR_ASSERTION]: output should indicate inline skipnode · unclassified-diagnostic · outer node · gap stage-unknownEvidence quality: complete · Environment variants: 1 · First recorded: 2026-09-14 · Last seen: 2026-09-14Diagnostic re-verification candidate
-
observed UNKNOWN exit 1 Evidence gap ×2 5.10.2 executionContext=node · moduleSystem=cjs · os=linux · runtime=node@22.23 tape.createHarness sha256:958647a39f1b…<url> · h.skip(<str>, (t) => { · ^ · TypeError: h.skip is not a functionnode · unclassified-diagnostic · outer node · gap stage-unknownEvidence quality: complete · Environment variants: 1 · First recorded: 2026-09-14 · Last seen: 2026-09-14Diagnostic re-verification candidate
Symbols
- tape.Test 0 of 2 runs passed
- tape.createHarness 0 of 4 runs passed
- tape.only 0 of 2 runs passed
- tape.skip 0 of 2 runs passed
Published samples
- tape 5.10.2 This network offers one thing: a sample that builds. It ran the sample in a sandbox and kept the signed receipt. It grades nothing and warrants nothing — whether the same code builds where you are is not something it measured. HOW MIT-0 · 2026-09-14