CodeSampleX

Recordsnpmpostcss8.5.6@theme

Change the conditions
Fixed
Symbol@theme Architecturex64 Package managernpm
Filter OSalpine musl Runtimenode 22 Package version8.5.6 Execution contextnode libcmusl Clear filters

Current conditions

@theme @8.5.6alpine musl · x64 · node 22 · npm · node

1 of 1 passed

Verified — this network ran a contract at this coordinate.

there is a sample here, and our run of it at this coordinate came back clean (1)

Project observations
nothing at this coordinate
Contract verifications
1 / 1
Last recorded
2026-08-17

Dependency Health

Observed combinations and failure evidence for this release

Observed problems 1 · Changed 1 · Steady 2

First observed break

8.5.6

windows · node@24.13 · moduleSystem=cjs · executionContext=node

8 FAIL · stage: PROJECT_COMPILE · fingerprint: sha256:0470f88d95bb52932e5704cdc30cfcecbd43ae71af54d4c5f93d16aa27317cd2

Library Version Health Measured there Projects
nanoid 3.3.11 CANDIDATE Correlated change; unproven combination contract passed 1 project-day
picocolors 1.1.1 PASS All observations passed contract passed 1 project-day
source-map-js 1.2.1 PASS All observations passed contract passed 1 project-day

The measured column is about each dependency's own release, not about the pair. A resolver placing two releases side by side is not evidence that they work together.

Dependency versions across releases

What each release of this package resolved its children to. A child whose version moved is listed first: that is where an upgrade changed something underneath you.

Moved: 1 · unchanged at every release: 2

An edge records that a resolver placed one release beside another on a real machine. It is not a claim that the two work together; that question is answered by samples and contracts, not by presence here.