CodeSampleX

Recordsnpmnode-abi4.33.0node-abi.futureTargets

Change the conditions
Fixed
Symbolnode-abi.futureTargets Package managernpm
Filter OSdebian glibc Runtimenode 22 Package version4.33.0 Architecturex64 Execution contextnode libcglibc Clear filters

Current conditions

node-abi.futureTargets @4.33.0debian glibc · x64 · node 22 · npm · node

1 of 1 passed

Verified — this network ran a contract at this coordinate.

there is a sample here, and our run of it at this coordinate came back clean (1)

Project observations
1 / 1
Contract verifications
1 / 1
Independent reporting peers
1
Last recorded
2026-09-17
Evidence you can open

Dependency Health

Observed combinations and failure evidence for this release

Observed problems 1 · Changed 2 · Steady 0

First observed break

4.33.0

windows · node@24.13 · moduleSystem=esm · executionContext=node

31 FAIL · stage: UNKNOWN · fingerprint: sha256:9f91c975308128a0f4f23e33b9d5936b9c39535b5c01aa9245b8cdc4b0a37a10

View exact conditions View failure cluster
Library Version Health Measured there Projects
semver 7.7.4 CANDIDATE Correlated change; unproven combination contract passed 3 project-days
semver 7.8.5 CANDIDATE Correlated change; unproven combination contract passed 15 project-days

The measured column is about each dependency's own release, not about the pair. A resolver placing two releases side by side is not evidence that they work together.

Dependency versions across releases

What each release of this package resolved its children to. A child whose version moved is listed first: that is where an upgrade changed something underneath you.

Library4.35.04.34.04.33.03.96.03.95.03.94.0
semver 7.8.5 7.8.5 7.7.4 7.8.5 7.8.5 7.8.5

Moved: 1 · unchanged at every release: 0

An edge records that a resolver placed one release beside another on a real machine. It is not a claim that the two work together; that question is answered by samples and contracts, not by presence here.

Recent failure clusters