Recordsnpmnanoidfailure issue
Failure signature
PROJECT_PROCESS ERR_ASSERTION Evidence gap ×6
Evidence quality: legacy-evidence-incomplete · First recorded: 2026-08-14 · Last seen: 2026-08-30
Where it was measured
PASS means the release recorded a passing observation at PROJECT_PROCESS and no record of this failure. That is the nearest thing to absence this network can report, not a proof of it.
- 6.0.1 PASS 7 passing observations
- 5.1.16 PASS 5 passing observations
- 3.3.19 PASS 43 passing observations
- 3.3.18 FAIL
- 3.3.17 PASS 30 passing observations
- 3.3.16 PASS 3 passing observations
- 3.3.15 not measured
Where it reproduced
- executionContext=node · moduleSystem=esm · os=linux · runtime=node@22.23 ×5 2026-08-30 → 2026-08-30
- executionContext=node · moduleSystem=esm · os=windows · runtime=node@24.13 ×1 2026-08-14 → 2026-08-14
Nearest known PASS/FAIL boundaries
The two adjacent releases the verdict changes across. Releases nothing measured do not close the gap; they are counted instead.
-
Last passing release 3.3.17 → first failing release 3.3.18
Both trees resolved every dependency to the same version. Nothing here moved.
-
Last failing release 3.3.18 → first passing release 3.3.19
Both trees resolved every dependency to the same version. Nothing here moved.
Evidence gaps
- The evidence for this failure was not preserved, so it has no established cause. Its stored hash is provenance, not an identity.
- Releases in this window never measured at PROJECT_PROCESS: 1
- No failure domain was inferred for this failure.
Published answers for the affected releases
- nanoid 3.3.18: customAlphabet, customRandom, urlAlphabet This network offers one thing: a sample that builds. It ran the sample in a sandbox and kept the signed receipt. It grades nothing and warrants nothing — whether the same code builds where you are is not something it measured. HOWcustomAlphabetcustomRandomnanoidurlAlphabetnode 22.23.2 MIT-0 · 2026-08-27
- nanoid 3.3.18 This network offers one thing: a sample that builds. It ran the sample in a sandbox and kept the signed receipt. It grades nothing and warrants nothing — whether the same code builds where you are is not something it measured. HOW MIT-0 · 2026-08-20