CodeSampleX

Recordsnpm@vitest/utilsfailure issue

Failure signature

PROJECT_TEST exit 1 ERR_ASSERTION ×1

AssertionError [ERR_ASSERTION]: The expression evaluated to a falsy value: · assert.ok(str.includes(<str>)) · at <url> { · generatedMessage: true,

Evidence quality: complete · javascript/test-runner · test-runner-diagnostic · outer npm test · First recorded: 2026-08-31 · Last seen: 2026-08-31

sha256:09efc419ec36…

@vitest/utils.cleanUrl @vitest/utils.createDefer @vitest/utils.deepClone @vitest/utils.deepMerge @vitest/utils.delay @vitest/utils.diff @vitest/utils.format @vitest/utils.getSafeTimers @vitest/utils.getType @vitest/utils.isObject @vitest/utils.isPrimitive @vitest/utils.nanoid @vitest/utils.notNullish @vitest/utils.processError @vitest/utils.slash @vitest/utils.stringify @vitest/utils.toArray @vitest/utils.unique

Where it was measured

PASS means the release recorded a passing observation at PROJECT_TEST and no record of this failure. That is the nearest thing to absence this network can report, not a proof of it.

Where it reproduced

Nearest known PASS/FAIL boundaries

The two adjacent releases the verdict changes across. Releases nothing measured do not close the gap; they are counted instead.

Dependency versions across releases

What each release of this package resolved its children to. A child whose version moved is listed first: that is where an upgrade changed something underneath you.

Moved: 2 · unchanged at every release: 1

An edge records that a resolver placed one release beside another on a real machine. It is not a claim that the two work together; that question is answered by samples and contracts, not by presence here.

Evidence gaps

Published answers for the affected releases

Back to the package