CodeSampleX

Recordsnpm@vitest/utils4.0.18

Change the conditions
Fixed
OSubuntu glibc Package version4.0.18 Package managernpm 10
Filter Runtimenode 22 Symbolwhole package Architecturex64 Execution contextnode libcglibc Clear filters

Current conditions

@vitest/utils @4.0.18ubuntu glibc · x64 · node 22 · npm 10 · node

package-level total, not an API

0 of 2 passed

Verified — this network ran a contract at this coordinate.

there is a sample here, and our run of it at this coordinate failed

Project observations
8 / 8
Contract verifications
0 / 2
Usage records
2
Independent reporting peers
2
Last recorded
2026-09-10

Dependency Health

Observed combinations and failure evidence for this release

Observed problems 1 · Changed 2 · Steady 0

First observed break

4.0.18

linux · node@22.23 · moduleSystem=esm · executionContext=node

1 FAIL · stage: UNKNOWN · fingerprint: sha256:dd6f3cbc20c5e6d9531a8992760483b250cca06259555896660d38cf68517ba4

Library Version Health Measured there Projects
@vitest/pretty-format 4.0.18 CANDIDATE Correlated change; unproven combination contract passed 9 project-days
tinyrainbow 3.1.1 CANDIDATE Correlated change; unproven combination contract passed 9 project-days

The measured column is about each dependency's own release, not about the pair. A resolver placing two releases side by side is not evidence that they work together.

Dependency versions across releases

What each release of this package resolved its children to. A child whose version moved is listed first: that is where an upgrade changed something underneath you.

Library4.1.114.1.104.0.184.0.164.0.03.2.73.2.43.0.02.1.9
@vitest/pretty-format 4.1.11 4.1.10 4.0.18 4.0.16 4.0.0 3.2.7 3.2.4 3.0.0 2.1.9
tinyrainbow 3.1.1 3.1.1 3.1.1 3.0.3 3.1.1 2.0.0 2.0.0 2.0.0 1.2.0
convert-source-map 2.0.0 2.0.0 — — — — — — —
loupe — — — — — 3.2.1 3.2.1 3.2.1 3.2.1

Moved: 2 · unchanged at every release: 2

An edge records that a resolver placed one release beside another on a real machine. It is not a claim that the two work together; that question is answered by samples and contracts, not by presence here.

Recent failure clusters