CodeSampleX

Recordsnpm@vitest/mocker4.1.11@vitest/mocker.collectModuleExports

Change the conditions
Fixed
Symbol@vitest/mocker.collectModuleExports Execution contextnode
Filter OSubuntu glibc Runtimenode 22 Package version4.1.11 Architecturex64 Package managernpm 10 libcglibc Clear filters

Current conditions

@vitest/mocker.collectModuleExports @4.1.11ubuntu glibc · x64 · node 22 · npm 10 · node

0 of 3 passed

Verified — this network ran a contract at this coordinate.

there is a sample here, and our run of it at this coordinate failed (2)

Project observations
3 / 3
Contract verifications
0 / 3
Independent reporting peers
2
Last recorded
2026-09-01

Dependency Health

Observed combinations and failure evidence for this release

Observed problems 1 · Changed 1 · Steady 2

First observed break

4.1.11

windows · node@24.13 · executionContext=node · moduleSystem=cjs

3 FAIL · stage: UNKNOWN · fingerprint: sha256:3e5f03903e292d9b19daef82b234201615ab763216b97feec6f325b598b3380d

Library Version Health Measured there Projects
@vitest/spy 4.1.11 CANDIDATE Correlated change; unproven combination contract passed 15 project-days
estree-walker 3.0.3 PASS All observations passed contract passed 15 project-days
magic-string 0.30.21 PASS All observations passed contract passed 15 project-days

The measured column is about each dependency's own release, not about the pair. A resolver placing two releases side by side is not evidence that they work together.

Dependency versions across releases

What each release of this package resolved its children to. A child whose version moved is listed first: that is where an upgrade changed something underneath you.

Moved: 1 · unchanged at every release: 2

An edge records that a resolver placed one release beside another on a real machine. It is not a claim that the two work together; that question is answered by samples and contracts, not by presence here.

Recent failure clusters