Recordsnpm@vitejs/plugin-react4.7.0
Change the conditions
Current conditions
@vitejs/plugin-react @4.7.0alpine musl · x64 · node 22 · npm · node
package-level total, not an API
1 of 1 passed
Verified — this network ran a contract at this coordinate.
there is a sample here, and our run of it at this coordinate came back clean (1)
- Project observations
- 2 / 2
- Contract verifications
- 1 / 1
- Usage records
- 1
- Independent reporting peers
- 1
- Last recorded
- 2026-08-30
Dependency Health
Observed combinations and failure evidence for this release
First observed break
4.7.0
windows · node@24.13 · moduleSystem=esm · executionContext=node
32 FAIL
· stage: UNKNOWN
· fingerprint: sha256:9f91c975308128a0f4f23e33b9d5936b9c39535b5c01aa9245b8cdc4b0a37a10
| Library | Version | Health | Measured there | Projects |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @rolldown/pluginutils | 1.0.0-beta.27 | CANDIDATE Correlated change; unproven combination | contract passed | 3 project-days |
| react-refresh | 0.17.0 | CANDIDATE Correlated change; unproven combination | contract passed | 3 project-days |
| @babel/core | 7.29.7 | PASS All observations passed | contract passed | 3 project-days |
| @babel/plugin-transform-react-jsx-self | 7.29.7 | PASS All observations passed | contract passed | 3 project-days |
| @babel/plugin-transform-react-jsx-source | 7.29.7 | PASS All observations passed | contract passed | 3 project-days |
| @types/babel__core | 7.20.5 | PASS All observations passed | contract passed | 3 project-days |
The measured column is about each dependency's own release, not about the pair. A resolver placing two releases side by side is not evidence that they work together.
Dependency versions across releases
What each release of this package resolved its children to. A child whose version moved is listed first: that is where an upgrade changed something underneath you.
Moved: 2 · unchanged at every release: 4
An edge records that a resolver placed one release beside another on a real machine. It is not a claim that the two work together; that question is answered by samples and contracts, not by presence here.