CodeSampleX

Recordsnpm@rollup/plugin-commonjs

Compatibility cube

Pick any two dimensions as axes; everything else becomes a filter. Clicking a cell pins its slice and drills one level deeper.

Fixed
OSdebian glibc Package version28.0.7
Filter Runtimenode 22 Package managernpm Execution contextnode libcglibc Clear filters
How to read the grid

Reading a cell: The number is how many recorded observations the rate divides — one build files an observation per stage it reached, so it counts neither builds nor machines nor people. The document beside it is a different fact from a different source: whether a sample exists at that coordinate, and how our own run of it went there.

  • no sample at this coordinate yet
  • there is a sample here, and nothing of ours has run it at this coordinate yet
  • there is a sample here, and our run of it at this coordinate came back clean
  • there is a sample here, and our run of it at this coordinate failed
  • there is a sample here, and this coordinate records both a passing and a failing run of it
  • nothing recorded — unknown, never "works" and never "broken"
  • there is a level below this cell — click to open it

A document means there is a sample at that coordinate. Whether one EXISTS is a fact about this release and this API and does not change with OS, runtime or package manager; its COLOUR is how that sample ran in the environment you are looking at.

Cells are aggregates of everything still varying in this slice (the n/m count says how much). Click one to pin its coordinates and see the next level.

Dependency Health

Observed combinations and failure evidence for this release

Observed problems 1 · Changed 2 · Steady 6

First observed break

28.0.7

linux · node@22.23 · moduleSystem=esm · executionContext=node

1 FAIL · stage: UNKNOWN · fingerprint: sha256:84b3f5326cf037772e4c56ddbf91fbfae6012d0ace24abd875349c5952a58271

Library Version Health Measured there Projects
@rollup/pluginutils 5.4.0 CANDIDATE Correlated change; unproven combination contract passed 9 project-days
picomatch 4.0.7 CANDIDATE Correlated change; unproven combination contract passed 9 project-days
commondir 1.0.1 PASS All observations passed contract passed 9 project-days
estree-walker 2.0.2 PASS All observations passed contract passed 9 project-days
fdir 6.5.0 PASS All observations passed contract passed 9 project-days
is-reference 1.2.1 PASS All observations passed contract passed 9 project-days
magic-string 0.30.21 PASS All observations passed contract passed 9 project-days
rollup 4.34.8 PASS All observations passed contract passed 1 project-day

The measured column is about each dependency's own release, not about the pair. A resolver placing two releases side by side is not evidence that they work together.

Dependency versions across releases

What each release of this package resolved its children to. A child whose version moved is listed first: that is where an upgrade changed something underneath you.

Moved: 2 · unchanged at every release: 6

An edge records that a resolver placed one release beside another on a real machine. It is not a claim that the two work together; that question is answered by samples and contracts, not by presence here.