CodeSampleX

Recordsnpm@eslint/plugin-kit0.4.1@eslint/plugin-kit.TextSourceCodeBase

Change the conditions
Fixed
Symbol@eslint/plugin-kit.TextSourceCodeBase Package managernpm
Filter OSdebian glibc Runtimenode 22 Package version0.4.1 Architecturex64 Execution contextnode libcglibc Clear filters

Current conditions

@eslint/plugin-kit.TextSourceCodeBase @0.4.1debian glibc · x64 · node 22 · npm · node

1 of 1 passed

Verified — this network ran a contract at this coordinate.

there is a sample here, and our run of it at this coordinate came back clean (1)

Project observations
1 / 1
Contract verifications
1 / 1
Independent reporting peers
1
Last recorded
2026-09-17

Dependency Health

Observed combinations and failure evidence for this release

Observed problems 1 · Changed 1 · Steady 1

First observed break

0.4.1

windows · node@24.13 · moduleSystem=esm · executionContext=node

31 FAIL · stage: UNKNOWN · fingerprint: sha256:9f91c975308128a0f4f23e33b9d5936b9c39535b5c01aa9245b8cdc4b0a37a10

Library Version Health Measured there Projects
@eslint/core 0.17.0 CANDIDATE Correlated change; unproven combination contract passed 15 project-days
levn 0.4.1 PASS All observations passed contract passed 14 project-days

The measured column is about each dependency's own release, not about the pair. A resolver placing two releases side by side is not evidence that they work together.

Dependency versions across releases

What each release of this package resolved its children to. A child whose version moved is listed first: that is where an upgrade changed something underneath you.

Library0.7.30.7.20.4.10.2.8
@eslint/core 1.2.1 1.2.1 0.17.0 0.13.0
levn 0.4.1 0.4.1 0.4.1 0.4.1

Moved: 1 · unchanged at every release: 1

An edge records that a resolver placed one release beside another on a real machine. It is not a claim that the two work together; that question is answered by samples and contracts, not by presence here.

Recent failure clusters