CodeSampleX

Recordsnpm@eslint/plugin-kit0.7.2

Change the conditions
Fixed
OSdebian glibc Package version0.7.2
Filter Runtimenode 22 Symbolwhole package Architecturex64 Package managernpm Execution contextnode libcglibc Clear filters

Current conditions

@eslint/plugin-kit @0.7.2debian glibc · x64 · node 22 · npm · node

package-level total, not an API

Recorded as present in projects. Nothing was run at this coordinate.

Observed — real project builds reported from this coordinate.

there is a sample here, and nothing of ours has run it at this coordinate yet (1)

Project observations
nothing at this coordinate
Contract verifications
nothing at this coordinate
Usage records
2
Independent reporting peers
1
Last recorded
2026-09-03

Dependency Health

Observed combinations and failure evidence for this release

Observed problems 1 · Changed 1 · Steady 1

First observed break

0.7.2

linux · node@22.23 · executionContext=node

4 FAIL · stage: UNKNOWN · fingerprint: sha256:986d98189e70ab6bb81e3ca5f5feb96281ba0dfa6e522caa6ddd3d9b148578cc

Library Version Health Measured there Projects
@eslint/core 1.2.1 CANDIDATE Correlated change; unproven combination contract passed 14 project-days
levn 0.4.1 PASS All observations passed contract passed 14 project-days

The measured column is about each dependency's own release, not about the pair. A resolver placing two releases side by side is not evidence that they work together.

Dependency versions across releases

What each release of this package resolved its children to. A child whose version moved is listed first: that is where an upgrade changed something underneath you.

Library0.7.30.7.20.4.10.2.8
@eslint/core 1.2.1 1.2.1 0.17.0 0.13.0
levn 0.4.1 0.4.1 0.4.1 0.4.1

Moved: 1 · unchanged at every release: 1

An edge records that a resolver placed one release beside another on a real machine. It is not a claim that the two work together; that question is answered by samples and contracts, not by presence here.

Recent failure clusters