CodeSampleX

Recordsnpm@eslint/eslintrc

there is a sample for this release and API (5)

Compatibility cube

Pick any two dimensions as axes; everything else becomes a filter. Clicking a cell pins its slice and drills one level deeper.

Fixed
Runtimenode 24 Package version3.3.6
Filter Symbolwhole package Architecturex64 Execution contextnode Clear filters
OS × Package manager
22026-09-26
How to read the grid

Reading a cell: The number is how many recorded observations the rate divides — one build files an observation per stage it reached, so it counts neither builds nor machines nor people. The document beside it is a different fact from a different source: whether a sample exists at that coordinate, and how our own run of it went there.

  • no sample at this coordinate yet
  • there is a sample here, and nothing of ours has run it at this coordinate yet
  • there is a sample here, and our run of it at this coordinate came back clean
  • there is a sample here, and our run of it at this coordinate failed
  • there is a sample here, and this coordinate records both a passing and a failing run of it
  • nothing recorded — unknown, never "works" and never "broken"
  • there is a level below this cell — click to open it

A document means there is a sample at that coordinate. Whether one EXISTS is a fact about this release and this API and does not change with OS, runtime or package manager; its COLOUR is how that sample ran in the environment you are looking at.

Cells are aggregates of everything still varying in this slice (the n/m count says how much). Click one to pin its coordinates and see the next level.

Dependency Health

Observed combinations and failure evidence for this release

Observed problems 1 · Changed 7 · Steady 4

First observed break

3.3.6

windows · node@24.13 · executionContext=node · moduleSystem=esm

32 FAIL · stage: UNKNOWN · fingerprint: sha256:9f91c975308128a0f4f23e33b9d5936b9c39535b5c01aa9245b8cdc4b0a37a10

Library Version Health Measured there Projects
ajv 6.15.0 CANDIDATE Correlated change; unproven combination contract passed 17 project-days
espree 10.4.0 CANDIDATE Correlated change; unproven combination contract passed 17 project-days
globals 14.0.0 CANDIDATE Correlated change; unproven combination contract passed 17 project-days
js-yaml 4.3.0 CANDIDATE Correlated change; unproven combination contract passed 3 project-days
js-yaml 4.3.1 CANDIDATE Correlated change; unproven combination contract passed 4 project-days
js-yaml 4.3.2 CANDIDATE Correlated change; unproven combination contract passed 10 project-days
minimatch 3.1.5 CANDIDATE Correlated change; unproven combination contract passed 17 project-days
debug 4.4.3 PASS All observations passed contract passed 17 project-days
ignore 5.3.2 PASS All observations passed contract passed 17 project-days
import-fresh 3.3.1 PASS All observations passed contract passed 17 project-days
strip-json-comments 3.1.1 PASS All observations passed contract passed 16 project-days

The measured column is about each dependency's own release, not about the pair. A resolver placing two releases side by side is not evidence that they work together.

Dependency versions across releases

What each release of this package resolved its children to. A child whose version moved is listed first: that is where an upgrade changed something underneath you.

Moved: 5 · unchanged at every release: 4

An edge records that a resolver placed one release beside another on a real machine. It is not a claim that the two work together; that question is answered by samples and contracts, not by presence here.