CodeSampleX

Recordsgolanggopkg.in/yaml.v2v2.4.0

Change the conditions
Fixed
OSalpine musl Symbolwhole package
Filter Runtimego 1.26 Package versionv2.4.0 Architecturex64 Package managergo Execution contextgo libcmusl Clear filters

Current conditions

gopkg.in/yaml.v2 @v2.4.0alpine musl · x64 · go 1.26 · go · go

package-level total, not an API

1 of 1 passed

Verified — this network ran a contract at this coordinate.

there is a sample here, and our run of it at this coordinate came back clean (1)

Project observations
2 / 2
Contract verifications
1 / 1
Usage records
3
Independent reporting peers
1
Last recorded
2026-09-07

Dependency Health

Observed combinations and failure evidence for this release

Observed problems 1 · Changed 3 · Steady 0

First observed break

v2.4.0

linux · node@22.23 · moduleSystem=cjs · executionContext=node

6 FAIL · stage: PROJECT_PROCESS

Library Version Health Measured there Projects
gopkg.in/check.v1 v0.0.0-20161208181325-20d25e280405 CANDIDATE Correlated change; unproven combination contract passed 5 project-days
gopkg.in/check.v1 v1.0.0-20190902080502-41f04d3bba15 CANDIDATE Correlated change; unproven combination nothing measured 2 project-days
gopkg.in/check.v1 v1.0.0-20201130134442-10cb98267c6c CANDIDATE Correlated change; unproven combination contract passed 3 project-days

The measured column is about each dependency's own release, not about the pair. A resolver placing two releases side by side is not evidence that they work together.

Dependency versions across releases

What each release of this package resolved its children to. A child whose version moved is listed first: that is where an upgrade changed something underneath you.

Moved: 1 · unchanged at every release: 0

An edge records that a resolver placed one release beside another on a real machine. It is not a claim that the two work together; that question is answered by samples and contracts, not by presence here.

Recent failure clusters