CodeSampleX

Recordsgolanggolang.org/x/net

Change the conditions
Fixed
OSalpine musl Package versionv0.0.0-20190620200207-3b0461eec859
Filter Runtimego 1.26 Architecturex64 Package managergo Execution contextgo libcmusl Clear filters

Current conditions

golang.org/x/net @v0.0.0-20190620200207-3b0461eec859alpine musl · x64 · go 1.26 · go · go

1 of 1 passed

Verified — this network ran a contract at this coordinate.

there is a sample here, and our run of it at this coordinate came back clean (1)

Project observations
2 / 2
Contract verifications
1 / 1
Usage records
1
Independent reporting peers
1
Last recorded
2026-08-30

Exact records

This slice is down to its measured combinations — the environments below are exactly what ran.

Dependency Health

Observed combinations and failure evidence for this release

Changed 3 · Steady 0

Dependency changes observed: 3. No failure evidence is linked to these resolved trees yet.

Library Version Health Measured there Projects
golang.org/x/crypto v0.0.0-20191011191535-87dc89f01550 CHANGED Version changed, no linked failure builds observed 2 project-days
golang.org/x/sys v0.0.0-20190412213103-97732733099d CHANGED Version changed, no linked failure nothing measured 2 project-days
golang.org/x/text v0.3.0 CHANGED Version changed, no linked failure nothing measured 2 project-days

The measured column is about each dependency's own release, not about the pair. A resolver placing two releases side by side is not evidence that they work together.

Dependency versions across releases

What each release of this package resolved its children to. A child whose version moved is listed first: that is where an upgrade changed something underneath you.

Moved: 4 · unchanged at every release: 0

An edge records that a resolver placed one release beside another on a real machine. It is not a claim that the two work together; that question is answered by samples and contracts, not by presence here.