CodeSampleX

Recordsgolanggolang.org/x/cryptov0.52.0golang.org/x/crypto/bcrypt.InvalidCostError

Change the conditions
Fixed
Runtimego 1.26 Package versionv0.52.0 Symbolgolang.org/x/crypto/bcrypt.InvalidCostError
Filter OSubuntu glibc Architecturex64 Package managergo 1 libcglibc Clear filters

Current conditions

golang.org/x/crypto/bcrypt.InvalidCostError @v0.52.0ubuntu glibc · x64 · go 1.26 · go 1

2 of 2 passed

Observed — real project builds reported from this coordinate.

no sample at this coordinate yet

Project observations
2 / 2
Contract verifications
nothing at this coordinate
Independent reporting peers
1
Last recorded
2026-08-30

Dependency Health

Observed combinations and failure evidence for this release

Observed problems 3 · Steady 0

First observed break

v0.52.0 golang.org/x/net@v0.55.0

windows · go@1.26

3 FAIL · stage: PROJECT_TEST

Library Version Health Measured there Projects
golang.org/x/net v0.55.0 FAIL Linked failure observed; version changed across releases contract passed 2 project-days
golang.org/x/sys v0.45.0 FAIL Linked failure observed; version changed across releases contract passed 2 project-days
golang.org/x/term v0.43.0 FAIL Linked failure observed; version changed across releases contract passed 2 project-days

The measured column is about each dependency's own release, not about the pair. A resolver placing two releases side by side is not evidence that they work together.

Dependency versions across releases

What each release of this package resolved its children to. A child whose version moved is listed first: that is where an upgrade changed something underneath you.

Moved: 3 · unchanged at every release: 0

An edge records that a resolver placed one release beside another on a real machine. It is not a claim that the two work together; that question is answered by samples and contracts, not by presence here.

Recent failure clusters