CodeSampleX

Recordsgolanggithub.com/klauspost/cpuid/v2

Change the conditions
Fixed
Package versionv2.2.10 Symbolcpuid.CPU
Filter Runtimego 1.26 Architecturex64 Package managergo Execution contextgo Clear filters

Current conditions

cpuid.CPU @v2.2.10x64 · go 1.26 · go · go

1 of 2 passed

Verified — this network ran a contract at this coordinate.

there is a sample here, and this coordinate records both a passing and a failing run of it (1)

Project observations
0 / 1
Contract verifications
1 / 2
Independent reporting peers
1
Failures with a captured fingerprint
0 / 1
Last recorded
2026-09-07

Exact records

This slice is down to its measured combinations — the environments below are exactly what ran.

Dependency Health

Observed combinations and failure evidence for this release

Observed problems 1 · Changed 2 · Steady 0

First observed break

v2.2.10

go@1.26

4 FAIL · stage: PROJECT_TEST

Library Version Health Measured there Projects
golang.org/x/sys v0.30.0 CANDIDATE Correlated change; unproven combination contract passed 2 project-days
golang.org/x/sys v0.31.0 CANDIDATE Correlated change; unproven combination contract passed 2 project-days

The measured column is about each dependency's own release, not about the pair. A resolver placing two releases side by side is not evidence that they work together.

Dependency versions across releases

What each release of this package resolved its children to. A child whose version moved is listed first: that is where an upgrade changed something underneath you.

Libraryv2.3.0v2.2.10
golang.org/x/sys v0.45.0 v0.31.0

Moved: 1 · unchanged at every release: 0

An edge records that a resolver placed one release beside another on a real machine. It is not a claim that the two work together; that question is answered by samples and contracts, not by presence here.