Recordsgolanggithub.com/jackc/chunkreader/v2failure issue
Failure signature
UNKNOWN exit 101 Evidence gap ×1
error: failed to parse manifest at `<user>/.gemini/antigravity-cli/scratch/Cargo.toml` · Caused by: · no targets specified in the manifest …
Evidence quality: complete · cargo · unclassified-diagnostic · outer cargo · gap stage-unknown · First recorded: 2026-09-20 · Last seen: 2026-09-20
sha256:33bb84b66619…
Where it was measured
PASS means the release recorded a passing observation at UNKNOWN and no record of this failure. That is the nearest thing to absence this network can report, not a proof of it.
Where it reproduced
- os=linux · runtime=go@1.26 ×1 2026-09-20 → 2026-09-20
Nearest known PASS/FAIL boundaries
No release either side of this failure recorded a passing observation at this stage, so where it starts and stops is not established.
Evidence gaps
- The evidence for this failure was not preserved, so it has no established cause. Its stored hash is provenance, not an identity.
- The captured output could not establish: stage-unknown.
- No release in this window recorded a passing observation at UNKNOWN.
- Releases in this window never measured at UNKNOWN: 1
- No failure domain was inferred for this failure.
Published answers for the affected releases
- github.com/jackc/chunkreader/v2 v2.0.1: chunkreader.New This network offers one thing: a sample that builds. It ran the sample in a sandbox and kept the signed receipt. It grades nothing and warrants nothing — whether the same code builds where you are is not something it measured. HOWchunkreader.Newgo 1.26.6 MIT-0 · 2026-08-26
- github.com/jackc/chunkreader/v2 v2.0.1: chunkreader.ChunkReader.Next This network offers one thing: a sample that builds. It ran the sample in a sandbox and kept the signed receipt. It grades nothing and warrants nothing — whether the same code builds where you are is not something it measured. HOWchunkreader.ChunkReader.Next MIT-0 · 2026-08-26
- github.com/jackc/chunkreader/v2 v2.0.1 This network offers one thing: a sample that builds. It ran the sample in a sandbox and kept the signed receipt. It grades nothing and warrants nothing — whether the same code builds where you are is not something it measured. HOW MIT-0 · 2026-08-23