CodeSampleX

Recordsgolangcel.dev/exprv0.19.1cel.dev/expr.Expr

Change the conditions
Fixed
OSalpine musl Package versionv0.19.1 Symbolcel.dev/expr.Expr
Filter Runtimego 1.26 Architecturex64 Package managergo Execution contextgo libcmusl Clear filters

Current conditions

cel.dev/expr.Expr @v0.19.1alpine musl · x64 · go 1.26 · go · go

1 of 1 passed

Verified — this network ran a contract at this coordinate.

there is a sample here, and our run of it at this coordinate came back clean (1)

Project observations
nothing at this coordinate
Contract verifications
1 / 1
Last recorded
2026-08-23

Dependency Health

Observed combinations and failure evidence for this release

Changed 4 · Steady 0

Dependency changes observed: 4. No failure evidence is linked to these resolved trees yet.

Library Version Health Measured there Projects
google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpc v0.0.0-20240826202546-f6391c0de4c7 CHANGED Version changed, no linked failure contract passed 1 project-day
google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpc v0.0.0-20241007155032-5fefd90f89a9 CHANGED Version changed, no linked failure contract passed 1 project-day
google.golang.org/protobuf v1.34.2 CHANGED Version changed, no linked failure contract passed 1 project-day
google.golang.org/protobuf v1.35.1 CHANGED Version changed, no linked failure contract passed 1 project-day

The measured column is about each dependency's own release, not about the pair. A resolver placing two releases side by side is not evidence that they work together.

Dependency versions across releases

What each release of this package resolved its children to. A child whose version moved is listed first: that is where an upgrade changed something underneath you.

Moved: 2 · unchanged at every release: 0

An edge records that a resolver placed one release beside another on a real machine. It is not a claim that the two work together; that question is answered by samples and contracts, not by presence here.